 |
 | |  | |  | |  |
One of the better ways of presenting the argument as to why John Searle's Chinese Room
Argument is wrong was presented in the book Beyond AI, by J. Storrs Hall (p. 275-277). He
points out that if you represent something that is mechanical and way too slow to be intelligent,
nothing that incredibly slow could be intelligent.
It is like comparing the moisture on your finger used to turn a page to the moisture in an
Olympic-sized swimming pool. If the difference between two things is many orders of magnitude,
then it is more than quantitatively different, it is truly qualitatively different.
Next
Argument is wrong was presented in the book Beyond AI, by J. Storrs Hall (p. 275-277). He
points out that if you represent something that is mechanical and way too slow to be intelligent,
nothing that incredibly slow could be intelligent.
It is like comparing the moisture on your finger used to turn a page to the moisture in an
Olympic-sized swimming pool. If the difference between two things is many orders of magnitude,
then it is more than quantitatively different, it is truly qualitatively different.
Next