
Chapter Five
Janus was looking around on the internet and ran into this blog entry:
http://www.protectpatientsblog.com/2010/03/psa_tests_inventor_says_its_ti.html
PSA Test's Inventor Says It's Time to Say No to Routine PSA Screening
The man who discovered the PSA test for prostate cancer now says the test is so
overused it has become a public health disaster with an annual price tag of $3 billion in
wasted testing.
Dr. Richard Ablin writes an op-ed piece in the New York Times calling for the test to be
abandoned for routine cancer screening for men over age 50. At most the test is useful
in men with a family history of prostate cancer and also useful to detect cancer coming
back in men who have already has their prostates removed for cancer.
Dr. Ablin notes that the appropriate use of the test is a tiny portion of the amount of
testing now occurring, driven by those who profit from use of the test. He concludes:
I never dreamed that my discovery four decades ago would lead to such a profit-driven
public health disaster. The medical community must confront reality and stop the
inappropriate use of P.S.A. screening. Doing so would save billions of dollars and
rescue millions of men from unnecessary, debilitating treatments.
As this blog noted in an entry a year ago, large studies have been published showing
that the PSA test saves very few, if any lives, when used for routine screening, and it
causes many men to undergo unnecessary, painful and potentially harmful biopsies and
surgery.
People interested in learning more about our firm's legal services, including medical
malpractice in Washington, D.C., Maryland and Virginia, may ask questions or send us
information about a particular case by phone or email. There is no charge for contacting
us regarding your inquiry. A malpractice attorney will respond within 24 hours.
All contents copyrighted 2010 Patrick Malone & Associates except where copyright held
by others. Reproduction in any form prohibited except where expressly granted.
Apparently we need fewer doctors and more lawyers. At least that is the opinion of lawyers.
Could it be that health insurance could lead to people getting prostate checkups and
eventually suffering from the results of the checkups and subsequent biopsies and radiation?
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/10/opinion/10Ablin.html
End of Chapter Five
Next