New Source of Information
Wolfram's Alpha is a good scientific source of information. But we need a means by which information
may be added by more people. Wiki does this, but you get biased information. Global Warming, for
example, was put into Wikipedia in a biased manner. What if one could have a Wikipedia which was
tailored to the individual's belief system?
At some point you need a Wikipedia which keeps track of new scientific research and incorporates the
new information into the Wikipedia. If you ever searched Wikipedia for a particular term and the entry is
changed, do you get the update sent to you?
The whole thing needs to be all combined. RSS feeds, social networking, scientific facts networking,
having amateurs do updates, email, etc.
Next
Wolfram's Alpha is a good scientific source of information. But we need a means by which information
may be added by more people. Wiki does this, but you get biased information. Global Warming, for
example, was put into Wikipedia in a biased manner. What if one could have a Wikipedia which was
tailored to the individual's belief system?
At some point you need a Wikipedia which keeps track of new scientific research and incorporates the
new information into the Wikipedia. If you ever searched Wikipedia for a particular term and the entry is
changed, do you get the update sent to you?
The whole thing needs to be all combined. RSS feeds, social networking, scientific facts networking,
having amateurs do updates, email, etc.
Next
Inventbot, inventing new creatures
 | |  | |  | |  |